Caring for Creation

My friend Matthew Bartlett recently started his own publishing company, and his first book is The Biblical Mandate for Caring for Creation by retired New Zealand minister Dick Tripp. The 158-page book, which can be yours for a mere $24.99, is definitely worth a read. Actually, “worth a read” is not a great compliment — what this book and this topic deserve is thought and action.

This post is partly a book review, and partly a discussion of the subject more generally. In terms of the book, there are several things I didn’t love about it, but there are many things I did, so I’m going to start with those.

Things I loved

His biblical take on the subject. Chapter 6 through to the end of the book is a thorough look at what Genesis through to Revelation has to say about creation, how God sees it, and how we should treat it. In the introduction, Tripp notes that

It is the revelation of Scripture, what God himself thinks about his creation, that should provide the most compelling reason of all for Christians to be concerned about it.

As well as quoting a lot of Scripture, Tripp shows how some of the big themes of the Bible tie in directly to caring for creation. Some examples: God’s love of fruitfulness, the goodness of creation, humans being made in God’s image, the Fall, an emphasis on “land” with Israel, and the new heavens and the new earth.

It’s pretty simple, really. As Christians, we believe God made the world and everything in it, and he made it very good. The universe is the greatest work of art by the greatest Artist. So we should do what we do with other good art: enjoy, respect, and preserve. And by preserve, I don’t mean keeping it under a glass case, like old art in a museum. The world is living art. It’s the most amazing display of interactive art there is — and it’s not merely interactive, it’s to be cared for and ruled. (In chapter 7 Tripp goes into detail about what “ruling it” means, and what it doesn’t.)

On a related note, although I don’t usually go for bold text in books, the author and publisher have done something I really liked in this one: all Scripture quotations are in a semi-bold font. It makes them stand out, and shows how much Tripp digs into the Word in chapters 6 through 14.

I also appreciate the timeliness of the book, in the sense that this topic — caring for creation, the environment, etc — isn’t something evangelical Christians have been saying much about. We say we’re conservative, but we’re more worried about conserving thees and thous than trees and boughs!

There’s Francis Schaeffer’s Pollution and the Death of Man, a really thought-provoking little book, but published in 1970. Then there are a few concerned individuals who’ve said something since then, but other than that, we’ve left the topic to the liberals and greenies! Okay, I’m being somewhat tongue-in-cheek here. In fact, Tripp’s book shows just how much has been written and done about it since then — and a lot of that by orthodox Christians.

Tripp doesn’t compromise core Christian truth (in fact, he also authors a Christian apologetics website). He’s big on the message of the gospel: our brokenness, and our need to submit our lives to the Creator and Saviour. He’s clear that if we don’t care for our souls, our care for creation is going to mean little. In his conclusion, he notes that “perhaps the greatest reason for caring for the earth is, simply, gratitude.”

Oh, and I enjoyed his five references to C. S. Lewis. How can you go wrong with that? Seriously, though, Lewis thought a lot about this topic: not so much environmentalism, but God’s care for creation and creatures. In fact, you could see the entire Chronicles of Narnia as a story against cruelty to animals. In the chapter on humans being made in God’s image, Tripp says:

C S Lewis, who wrestled in many essays with the senselessness of animal suffering, argued that is was precisely because humans are higher than animals in creation’s hierarchy that they should oppose animal cruelty. Our superiority to animals ought to motivate us ‘to prove ourselves better than the beasts precisely by the fact of acknowledging duties to them which they do not acknowledge to us.’

Near the end of the book, he also notes Lewis’s rejoicing in the final renewal of creation:

C S Lewis painted a great picture of this in the conclusion of The Chronicles of Narnia. Aslan takes the children into a new world. Following a great conflagration of fire and wind they see a world strangely familiar and yet one in which every blade of grass and every leaf on every tree seems to mean more. Everything is deeper.

Thinking of Narnia and animals reminds me of a discussion I had a few years back with some folks in our youth group. Someone said how sad it was that there are only about 5000 tigers left in the world today, when just 100 years ago there were probably more than 100,000. A dissenting voice said something like, “Saving animals is for greenies … who cares if a few big cats die out. They’re just another animal!” That’s not only callous, it’s theologically screwed up, forgetting God made all things good. The tiger is my favourite big cat, and one of the most wild and beautiful animals designed by God — but for every 20, we’ve killed 19.

Things I didn’t love

There were a few things about Tripp’s book that I didn’t go for. First, I’m not a fan of how the book begins. I’ll admit my bias up-front: I’m skeptical of much in the modern environmental movement — if you want, put me in the “fairly typical right-leaning Christian” basket. In the first few chapters, he quotes a huge number of statistics from all sorts of people, some of them very sad, some of them hard to believe, and a few of them almost laughable. Apart from the fact that you can prove anything with statistics, I thought this was an unconvincing start for a book with Biblical Mandate in the title.

Tripp is no doubt trying to use these facts to build an emotive case for the need to care for creation. But for many, beginning with a truckload of scary facts may work against his argument. And a few of the statistics simply need removal. For example, he quotes the WWF saying that “the only nation living sustainably is Cuba.” Huh? Cuba has one of the worst human rights records around. The WWF might as well have said, “Adolf Hitler was a non-smoking vegetarian who loved animals,” which is factually correct, but completely misses the more important issue.

However, plenty of the facts sound reasonable enough, and many are incredibly sad. Just one example: “4 billion cases of diarrhoea each year are associated with lack of access to safe water. 1.7 million people, mainly children under five, will die as a result.” There is a lot to think about in these first few chapters, and the statistics-laden beginning doesn’t spoil the book. As I mentioned above, the rest of the book is filled with Biblical and philosophical arguments for why all this matters.

Second, I didn’t love his general acceptance of leftist evaluations of the problem. This is related to the above: particularly near the beginning of the book, he quotes a whole spectrum of different environmentalists. While I appreciate his non-partisan spirit, the problem with this is that they have very different ideas on how to solve said problem. So much of the time, proposed “solutions” to environmental problems involve stricter and stricter laws. But if the main problem is greed, the solution is not bigger government; it’s getting rid of greed. That’s a much harder problem to solve, of course, but it’s one that the Bible has some pretty good answers to.

Finally, Tripp’s stance on evolution didn’t sit right. He’s dismissive of Christians who “are more concerned with how God created the earth, and in particular in arguing against evolutionary scientists, than they are with our responsibility to revel in, nurture and sustain God’s creation today”. He also says it’s “significant that Genesis does not state the process by which God made the earth”. Hmmm … my version of Genesis 1 states the process quite clearly: God spoke, and it was so.

Sure, I disagree with him on how God created the earth, and that’s fine as far as it goes. However, there are two problems here. First, I think his dismissals are rather simplistic, and he may end up turning away more conservative Christian readers than he intends. Second, it strikes me that the creationist position is actually stronger when it comes to caring for creation. If all of of life (including humans) evolved by random mutations, what is there to make each species so worth preserving, like a unique piece of art? But if God designed and created each type of plant and animal as a work of living art, then we have every reason to care for them all.

That said, I appreciate the fact he doesn’t dwell on this, or make a big deal about it throughout the book. Instead, he simply points people to his earlier booklet on the subject, The Complementary Nature of Science and Christianity (which I haven’t yet read).

Where to from here

Tripp ends with (and I say this respectfully) a good, old-fashioned call to acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord of our lives and Saviour of the world. One of the results of acknowledging Christ, he says, will be a new appreciation of the world in which we live. He notes that while there are many “generic reasons” to care for the earth, Christians have even more reasons — God-centred ones at that:

The earth is of value because it is God’s creation; he has declared it good and he delights in it; he has appointed us his vice-regents to care for it as well as for one another … and, in view of the resurrection, we have assurance that any good we do will not be in vain.

So practically, where can conserve-ative Christians start? Tripp’s book is about the biblical mandate to care for creation, not so much how to care for it, but he does provide some helpful pointers and further reading.

For one thing, reading his book makes me want to re-read Schaeffer’s Pollution and the Death of Man. Tripp mentions this book positively in his chapter on Christians and the environment, and it was Schaeffer’s book that started me thinking about the topic several years ago.

But there’s more than just things to read. Tripp mentions A Rocha a few times — they’re a Christian organization already doing creation-care in various places throughout the world. John Stott, theologian and bird-watcher, had a fair bit to do with A Rocha. Incidentally, the publisher’s sister and her husband, Anna and Lynton Baird, recently returned from a trip helping A Rocha in Canada and Kenya. In short, A Rocha seems like a really good place to start for those keen to help “in the field”.

One concern of mine is that while people are willing to talk about “saving the planet”, they are often unwilling to think about things like frugality. I really think part of the reason we use and abuse so many natural resources is because we want as many nice things as the next guy. Call it greed, covetousness, or whatever you want, but Christians especially need to be content with what they have, if not less. Many of our mothers and grandmothers exemplified this, as well as the now-forgotten attitude of “waste not, want not.”

As an American-born New Zealander, this seems to be even more of a problem here in the United States. Everything comes wrapped in a few layers of petroleum-derived product and then double-bagged. “Organic” vegetables that cost three times as much as normal produce are carefully sealed in fancy plastic containers. Every other person on the subway is carrying their coffee in a throw-away cup. Convenient, efficient, and ugly — right down to the litter scattered on the footpaths. P. J. O’Rourke’s quip is very true: “Everybody wants to save the earth; nobody wants to help Mom do the dishes.”

So go help mum with the dishes. Then check out A Rocha, order Dick Tripp’s book, start thinking about how you can care for creation, and post your thoughts in a comment!

11 thoughts on “Caring for Creation

  1. Very thoughtful review! And yes, I’m guilty of some of the above, but I’m trying to do better in some areas. Do you know if Dick Tripp is related to Paul Tripp?

    • Thanks, Joan. I don’t think he’s related, as Dick Tripp is Kiwi. The blurb about him in the book’s PDF brochure says he’s a “retired Anglican clergyman who has worked in parish ministry in the Diocese of Christchurch, New Zealand” and “a director in a family farm and is actively involved in the restoration of nearby native bush”.

  2. I appreciated your review. Good and careful analysis. One point which Tripp may not have made (I haven’t read the book.) is that due to the Fall the Mission Mandate must take priority over the Creation Mandate. Not that former abrogates the latter but there is a priority. Reason: this world is under judgment and is passing away.

    So why don’t we totally disregard the creation mandate? Because this world is our home (for the time being) and God makes clear that we are to care for our home which is after all His gift to us.

    In view of the fact that since the Fall man has perversely and often systematically been guilty of ruining God’s gift, I am very thankful that God gave us a very robust, living world as our home. Otherwise we might not have any place to live! Man would have completely destroyed his home. Surely the robustness of God’s creation is another evidence of God’s goodness toward his sinful creatures.

    By the way Jay Wile has posted many articles on his web site which show the robustness of God’s creation. He is definitely worth a read: http://blog.drwile.com/

    • Tripp doesn’t discuss the Mission Mandate much in this book. Though it’s pretty clear from his apologetics website that he thinks it’s a priority.

      However, he does discuss at length the renewal of creation, including what exactly 2 Peter 3:10-13 means with “the earth and everything in it will be laid bare” and “we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth”. I’m sure Matthew would love it if you bought the book :-), but you can also read this chapter online.

      Dad, do you think the “new heavens and new earth” will be a cleansed version of this one (which God did make good), or something totally different?

      • Renewed earth and heavens not totally new. For two reasons the Greek term kainos is used rather than neos. The former connotes new in quality, the latter new in time. Refer to Trench: Synonyms of the New Testament p.219-220. Also the context makes an analogy with the flood which destroyed (but not totally) the wicked world of Noah’s day. So I believe the fire will destroy (but not totally) the wicked world of our day. Out of which will be seen heavens and earth with a new quality (“in which righteousness dwell”) no longer subject to the curse.

      • Really good review, thanks, Ben!

        Good point which Dad makes, and a viewpoint which I really like, that the heavens & earth will be renewed, not a back-to-the-drawing-board new creation.

        It also makes me think of I Corinthians 3:12-13, which talks about how the quality of our work will be tested by fire, and that which survives will be rewarded. I guess that’s what Dad’s referring to, too. The context is directly about building the Church, but it doesn’t seem too much of a stretch too apply it to creation.

        C S Lewis also suggests this in The Last Battle when the friends of Narnia see Digory Kirk’s old house (in “heaven”), which they had thought destroyed, and it’s explained to them how everything good survives in the Real Narnia.

        To me, it’s a strong motivating factor to know that the work we do to care for the earth isn’t just sinking resources into an end-of-life planet. And it seems more consistent with the way God does things elsewhere — a person becomes born again to follow Christ; a renewed, changed person, but not somebody else.

  3. Semi-related…Ben, what was the name of the DVD series (sort of Planet Earth, part 2) that we started with you and Franci? Aunt Renie mentioned today that Grandpa has really enjoyed the Planet Earth segment on mountains (as well as a video she found on hummingbirds), and I was wondering about the title of that other series. Seemed like it was all about animals. Thanks.

    • I’m pretty sure you’re thinking of Life put out by the BBC. It’s an amazing series, and some superb footage! Those were actually Dad’s DVDs we watched — we bought them for him here and got a preview.

    • Also the Planet Earth BBC series is a 5 DVD series. There is some, but not much, overlap between it and the Life series. They are both great but you have to ignore the evolutionary “facts” presented and the at times blatant greenie philosophy. The photography is absolutely fantastic!!

  4. Well, I appreciated the references to the old-fashioned methods of washing dishes, and using more recycled materials in our day-to-day living. At the present stage of life, I find that in the course of doing dishes to recycle our plastics, hanging out my washing to dry (usually), and mending our clothes in order to conserve resources, I find limited time for reading books on the subject of conservation. But will keep Tripp’s book in mind….

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s